<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Evening Joe: A Heated Debate with One Clear Winner</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mitchbaroody.com/2010/01/29/evening-joe-a-heated-debate-with-one-clear-winner/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mitchbaroody.com/2010/01/29/evening-joe-a-heated-debate-with-one-clear-winner/</link>
	<description>Explaining the Truth About Conservatism One Post at a Time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 05:38:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randall A. Robinson</title>
		<link>http://mitchbaroody.com/2010/01/29/evening-joe-a-heated-debate-with-one-clear-winner/#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Randall A. Robinson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 01:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mitchbaroody.com/?p=166#comment-233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The ghost of Sanford is not a factor in the primary. In the general election, the Democrat will try to raise it, but South Carolinians supported Sanford&#039;s stances against the Feds. Sanford&#039;s personal disgrace doesn&#039;t carry over to the Republican nominee and any attempt by the Democrat nominee to tar the Republican with Sanford&#039;s problems will sound lame. So, I don&#039;t think that Nikki Haley&#039;s talking points on budget and dealing with the unpopular Obama administraton redound against her. She is the breath of fresh air that people are looking for today. I agree that this four-candidate field is strong. McMaster will get a lot of mileage from his actions with other states&#039; AGs on Obamacare and the Cornhusker Kickback. His actions are praiseworthy for this, but as for gubernatorial issues, he may be lacking. As for Bauer, he seems to be too much of a loose cannon to be ready for prime time, but he has staked out strong issue positions. Barrett is a nice guy who can&#039;t recover from his TARP vote blunder. I vote for Haley, a dynamic cross between Bobby Jindal and Sarah Palin. She, like Bauer, has come down for fundamental tax reform.  Bauer is my second choice.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ghost of Sanford is not a factor in the primary. In the general election, the Democrat will try to raise it, but South Carolinians supported Sanford&#8217;s stances against the Feds. Sanford&#8217;s personal disgrace doesn&#8217;t carry over to the Republican nominee and any attempt by the Democrat nominee to tar the Republican with Sanford&#8217;s problems will sound lame. So, I don&#8217;t think that Nikki Haley&#8217;s talking points on budget and dealing with the unpopular Obama administraton redound against her. She is the breath of fresh air that people are looking for today. I agree that this four-candidate field is strong. McMaster will get a lot of mileage from his actions with other states&#8217; AGs on Obamacare and the Cornhusker Kickback. His actions are praiseworthy for this, but as for gubernatorial issues, he may be lacking. As for Bauer, he seems to be too much of a loose cannon to be ready for prime time, but he has staked out strong issue positions. Barrett is a nice guy who can&#8217;t recover from his TARP vote blunder. I vote for Haley, a dynamic cross between Bobby Jindal and Sarah Palin. She, like Bauer, has come down for fundamental tax reform.  Bauer is my second choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: palmetto_moon</title>
		<link>http://mitchbaroody.com/2010/01/29/evening-joe-a-heated-debate-with-one-clear-winner/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[palmetto_moon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 03:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mitchbaroody.com/?p=166#comment-127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bauer, integrity? Surely you jest.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bauer, integrity? Surely you jest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Farkus</title>
		<link>http://mitchbaroody.com/2010/01/29/evening-joe-a-heated-debate-with-one-clear-winner/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Farkus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mitchbaroody.com/?p=166#comment-126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nikki Haley is pretty cute. But Andre Bauer is a rebel via so many speeding tickets. Not sure who to vote for. Maybe both. Possibly neither.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nikki Haley is pretty cute. But Andre Bauer is a rebel via so many speeding tickets. Not sure who to vote for. Maybe both. Possibly neither.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre Bauer</title>
		<link>http://mitchbaroody.com/2010/01/29/evening-joe-a-heated-debate-with-one-clear-winner/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andre Bauer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 19:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mitchbaroody.com/?p=166#comment-125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Evening Joe: A Heated Debate with One Clear Winner, by Mitch Baroody [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Evening Joe: A Heated Debate with One Clear Winner, by Mitch Baroody [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

